Tuesday, June 22, 2010

Comic 756: Ignorance

Publuic Opiuniion
We already knew that Randall loathed the media. Just a few weeks ago he was complaining about coverage of the recent Gulf oil spill, and last year he complained so ineptly about coverage of some now-forgotten Wall Street scandal that I was forced to get very angry.

On the flip side, we've also been subjected to reminders that Randall is hep to the new media: he's dropped references to slashdot, the Daily Show, and, in one epic namedrop of a comic, BBC, BoingBoing, Reddit and Five Thirty Eight. As far as I know, he has never referred to any element of the MSM in a positive light (if i'm wrong, let me know, i'll post a correction). update: being a stupid person, I missed that he also included cnn.com in that list of websites he reads. Not particularly positive, but given the same context as the others he mentions. So, I'd say I was basically wrong.

That's fine, he can have opinions, and it's not like hating the media is all that unusual. But, like any political (broadly defined) cause, complaining too often tends to get annoying. I also find that in many cases, people who are very committed to a cause like this tend to have terrible senses of humor about this sort of thing (or occasionally they will have great senses of humor, but rarely in the middle). Alas, this comic seems to be a case of substituting an argument for a joke.

The character in this comic is pretty much the definition of a straw man: He represents the group that Randall doesn't like, and rather than quote them, he makes up a quote that is silly in the most obvious but perfect way. Yes, he's satirizing what he thinks is a common phenomenon, but he's doing it by just making the people involved act like they have the intelligence of wood.

Compare this to another, hypothetical comedy outlet, a daily show, if you will. On this daily show, a host would play video clips of members of the media saying silly things, perhaps contradictory ones. The difference between this comic and the daily show is that the daily show plays (ahem, would theoretically play) actual clips. As in, not putting words in anyone's mouths. That's what makes it funny - anyone can pretend that a person said something dumb. What's far better is seeing that person actually say it.

This is true for the first half of the comic as well: Unless "a leading politician" actually said what this comic claims he said, the whole thing is really just a manufactured story. Again, if he is referring to something specific, I will admit that I'm wrong, but the incredible vagueness of "a leading politician" makes me think otherwise.

Now, many of you might say, "man, he's making fun of a common thing, so he's making up an example but it could have easily been any number of actual examples." To which I say: Well, why not use an actual example? It will be funnier by virtue of being true, and it won't smack of "angry man making up a quote" the way this comic does.

And Last, the alt text's comparison is actually not that bad, if you live in a universe where the people on the Titanic were screaming with delight.

93 comments:

  1. I'd agree with his main point: that media voxpops are overused and no substitute for actual journalism.

    Attempting to use this as a joke is ridiculous, though. It's not an inherently unfunny concept but Randall is not the man to make it work.

    ReplyDelete
  2. "But, like any political (broadly defined) cause, complaining too often tends to get annoying."

    This was the best part. <_<

    ReplyDelete
  3. The comic will be a little late tonight due to my problems.

    randall you had best reckanize that one of those problems is "a shitty sense of humor"

    ReplyDelete
  4. "The comic will be a little late tonight due to my problems."
    Your problems have never stopped you from posting a comic before.

    ReplyDelete
  5. First off I'd like to say that I hated this comic - it didn't get so much as a smirk out of me and usually xkcd can generate at least a half-hearted chuckle.

    Secondly I don't think that you really caught the joke (at least I didn't see it mentioned in the critique). As far as I can tell the premise is that MSM sucks, or rather, has a problem. This is established in the first block of text. The "humor" then comes from the irony of the journalist reporting on the problem with the problem.

    I think a similar joke would go as such:
    -Randall is a drunken fool.
    -Randall is sad about being a drunken fool.
    -Randall drinks his tears away

    Obviously not perfectly analogous but I hope you can see the point.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Anon 9:08, I'd agree with you, if I didn't think that the newscaster is supposed to be taken completely seriously - i.e. Mr. Munroe thinks that the mainstream media would actually do this. Hence the strawman label. (The fact that the irony of the comic is not intrinsically funny adds to this interpretation.)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Hard to get more mainstream and old media than the BBC, man.

    ReplyDelete
  8. The alt-text on the new comic (757) made me groan. I felt fully indifferent on the comic itself.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wait what's wrong with the alt text?

    ReplyDelete
  10. Is... Is Randall's main audience really that interested in the latest news about loud annoying monotone instruments at a sports event? Is it worth using as alt-text? Is he even trying or does he go to a news site and pick a random word to insert as a reference?

    ReplyDelete
  11. 757 was confusing. I assume that in panel 2 black-hat man just shouted "BRAAAAAAP" while coincidentally holding up an air horn.

    ReplyDelete
  12. I liked this comic until I saw that there was a whole additional panel after the decent, if not predictable, punchline. Also, finally we're not hearing black hat talk about shit he's done, but he did something (however tame).

    As for the alt text, did anyone else download the vuvuzelas app just to annoy people?

    ReplyDelete
  13. BBC = New media?

    I lol'd

    ReplyDelete
  14. Same anon as immediately before. I think I meant to write "though predictable" but fucked up.

    I realized as I was writing the previous post that this comic wasn't particularly funny even though I laughed before I realized how generic the joke was. People will always laugh at people who are full of themselves getting cut down to size. I think that's why I laughed.

    ReplyDelete
  15. References that are unexpected can be okay. Vuvuzela's being far away from XKCD's target audience makes it *better* not *worse*. Better here meaning a slight chuckle, but still.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Are you kidding? Nerds are the #1 soccer fans in America.

    ReplyDelete
  17. I have never once heard an air horn that could be described as making a "braaaap" noise. Nor have I seen one PHYSICALLY KNOCK SOMEONE OVER.

    Also, more hate on people who go to school! Also also, the third panel is complete shit.

    ReplyDelete
  18. The vuvuzela is not 'far away from XKCD's target audience'. Not since it turned into a /b/ meme.

    ReplyDelete
  19. They have a whole subclass - soccer nerds. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FEhm-5bN3Po

    ReplyDelete
  20. The Goatkcd made me laugh.

    XKCD, on the other hand, went on to explain the joke (and the artwork). It even put a topical reference into the alt-text.

    Vuvuzela's a trending topic on Twitter at the moment of posting, which explains the target audience. It's tangentially nerdy, which is good enough for Randall these days.

    I'm just wondering when those moments would ever be worth it. Even if you did reply with that, it'd just be awkward. You'd be known as that weird guy who probably has Asperger's.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Lol vuvuzelas I have been reading news stories about how annoying they are and even heard them when watching the world cup myself GOOMH Randall!

    Good points about this comic: mr. Hat does something instead of saying he does something. Bad points about this comic: what he does is lame. Also the last panel is completely unnecessary.

    Carl's argument about 756 being unfunny because of the strawman rother than a real example, like The Daily Show would use, is spot on.

    ReplyDelete
  22. Well it's two big thumbs up from me to the airhorn comic. Funny! And I like the alt text - very topical.

    ReplyDelete
  23. The real football nerds already heard about vuvuzelas during 2009 FIFA Confederations Cup in South Africa. World Cup 2010 made them a mainstream meme, but it's hardly cutting edge stuff.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Think about how pathetic Black Hat is. He carries around a bunch of completely useless things just to use them at some point to make a funny. Kinda reminds me of a bearded guy from this xkcd, except even worse.

    ReplyDelete
  25. This just enhances the comic even more.

    But, one thing he did get right is that the alt-text has made a topical gag while it's still topical! Much more timely than the 50 year old JFK gag.

    ReplyDelete
  26. It's the week of the straw-man. Can't wait to see what contrived asshole Munroe conjures up for us on Friday.

    ReplyDelete
  27. whatever contrived asshole he comes up with for Friday's comic, we can rest assured that the last panel will be replaced with goatse's reassuring asshole in goatkcd.

    ReplyDelete
  28. http://www.theonion.com/video/breaking-news-some-bullshit-happening-somewhere,16928/

    Much better than 756

    ReplyDelete
  29. Vuvuzulas, amiright?

    ReplyDelete
  30. RanDULL's just jealous HE didn't graduate first in his class at caltech.

    I mean, how many times have we heard an equivelent
    "not to toot my own horn, but I used to work at NASA!

    ReplyDelete
  31. I can't stand how people on blogs, the news, newpapers, the radio and everywhere else won't shut up about vuvuzelas. I GET IT! THEY MAKE YOUR SOCCER GAME ANNOYING TO WATCH. I was excited to see that Randal didn't make a stupid vuvuzela joke until I read the alt-text. At least the main comic isn't about something no one will remember a year from now.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I expected a vuvuzela joke in the comic and was surprised not to see one. Oh, hey, there is some alt text... groan...

    ReplyDelete
  33. I got told off last week when I accused somebody here of making a strawman argument! :(

    And now Randall is accused of one because he drew a cartoon about something instead of quoting a specific example such as, er, well presumably Google would turn one up. I cant be bothered to look if Carl cant.

    So, once again we have: Art: shit; Joke: nonexistent; Writing: crap. So what do we kvetch about? I know! Lets bug Randall for failing to do the research!

    And why assume that the MSM *would* do the research? It sees competition from the internet - including forums like this - which consist of an article followed by user comments. It feels threatened by that level of interactivity, something it has hitherto been unable to achieve. So it starts soliciting voces pop for opinions, with the outcome you see.

    Now: is that *funny*? Of course not. Would quoting a specific example of the MSM doing this make it *funnier*? Of course not.

    Duh.

    ReplyDelete
  34. The alt-text reminds me of that time on Family Guy they made a random pop culture reference.

    ReplyDelete
  35. "why not use an actual example? It will be funnier by virtue of being true" - But isn't what the guy says in the comic the most oblivious thing he can say? It doesn't matter if no newscaster said it, because they say similar dumb things - every time it snows in England its "send us your photos of snow", as if we don't know what it looks like or if the weather is somehow news. So basically, the most ridiculous thing he can say points out how ridiculous the whole thing is.

    All I'm saying is I'm glad you only bitch about another webcomic, instead of writing your own.

    ReplyDelete
  36. John, I don;t know what magical "england" you live in, but here in the UK I have never, ever been asked by the telly news to send in pictures of snow.

    Also, the record amount of snow and distruption last winter that indirectly caused the deaths of a few people Is news.

    And when you said
    "I like to rape children and masturbate furiously to their charred remains- why SHOULDN'T we use straw men?"

    you were missing the point that by putting words in somone's mouth you're being

    a) Dishonest

    and

    b) Lazy- (if they news people say dumb shit all the time it should be EASY to make jokes about a direct quote)

    c wat i did dere?

    All I'm saying is I'm glad you only act like a dickhead on this thread, and not on this 'rob's rant'.

    http://xkcdsucks.blogspot.com/2010/01/wheres-your-webcomic.html

    ReplyDelete
  37. Carl: I request you replace "Rob's Rants" in the sidebar with "Rob'z Rantz", to attract the kids.

    ReplyDelete
  38. I actually enjoyed the latest comic -- the last panel may be unnecessary, but it didn't really ruin the proceedings.

    The alt-text: "HAI FOLKS I LEARNT A NEW WORD"

    ReplyDelete
  39. You bash that straw man Randy.

    You punch him right the fuck out.

    ReplyDelete
  40. as if we don't know what it looks like or if the weather is somehow news.

    1. When did they ever say "Send us pictures of your snow so that we can show everybody what snow looks like?" Why are you drawing the conclusion that it's meant to educate people on the appearance of snow?
    2. How is the weather not news?

    ReplyDelete
  41. There were a lot of pictures of snowmen. As Charlie Brooker say, snowmen are not news.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qO52SMQB7tE

    ReplyDelete
  42. wait, no, that's not the one. must have been last year's.

    goddamnit

    ReplyDelete
  43. man I'll bet if he had run this comic back in February the alt-text would've been about those annoying cowbells instead, does this make it better? Hell no

    ReplyDelete
  44. Hahaha! Hey gys, 756! Randall made a joke about how "to toot one's horn" can have two meanings... despite that one of those meanings was directly based off of the other! COMEDY GOLD!
    Oh, oh, and the comic also has someone he doesn't like getting punished! THIS COMIC IS PERFECT! Everyone hates people who boast about their substanceless achievements... unless it's about working for 6 months in NASA, of course!

    Oh, oh, and the alt-text: he mentioned how Vuvuzuelas are annoying... for no apparent reason? But it doesn't matter because it's topical and true to my opinions! GOOMHR!


    So what does the forum say today:
    1: 5 posts in and there's already a genuine GOOMHR for Vuvuzuela!
    2: People pointing out that, since Caltech doesn't grade students like that, Strawman must be extra annoying! Totally not Randall's fault in any way.
    3: Other people pointing out that Strawman misses the point of education and deserves to be punished. Observant.
    4: A heckuva lotta discussion on Vuvuzuelas. Like, the majority of the thread. Apparently people really like to let each other know that, yes, they do not like this commonly-disliked instrument. Over and over again.
    5: "Toot is an innately funny word. Like moist, or wang."

    ReplyDelete
  45. Toot is an innately funny word, and provides the only humour to be found in 757.

    Also, as mentioned above, panel 2 is arranged in such a way as to imply that the BRAAAP sound is coming from the person holding the horn and not the horn itself. How can a professional webcomic artist fail at rudimentary comic drawing conventions?

    Unless the air horn is so old that the air emitted is too weak to create a sound, forcing the black hat to improvise with his own voice. That actually seems funnier.

    ReplyDelete
  46. how can you say that complaining can get annoying if all you ever do is complain?

    ReplyDelete
  47. Yeah. I actually find it hilarious, him holding up the air horn, while yelling REALLY loud. That also better explains the other guy being so shocked.

    ReplyDelete
  48. wow anon 10.47 that was ONLY THE SECOND COMMENT ON THIS THREAD

    ReplyDelete
  49. He also mentions cnn in 477.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Oh wow a vuvuzela joke! How original, considering the cup started two weeks ago! LOOK GUYZ I CAN MAKE POP CULTURE REFERENCES TOO! ISNT SOUTH AFRICA CRAZY AMIRITE!

    cue the GOOMFH crowd, and Randall continues to bask in his willful ignorance of anything outside his worldview.

    ReplyDelete
  51. OMG I was just reading a Let's Play of Fate/Stay Night on Something Awful where they used sports-themed censorship of one of the ero scenes and people were commenting on the horrific choice of the word "vuvuzelas!" GOOMH Randall!

    ...or just quit reading the same eroge LP's as me, Randall. Really. I mean it, get out.

    ReplyDelete
  52. Reading a let's play is literally the single lamest thing it is possible for a human being to do.

    ReplyDelete
  53. Reading a Let's Play of an eroge is even worse. I mean, it's not like you can use the excuse that you're not good at video games. It's clicking choices! You can get a walkthrough!

    ReplyDelete
  54. hey guys what if some people took metaphors literally, wouldn't that be crazy

    ReplyDelete
  55. not quite as crazy as shithead randall thinking up something real.

    ReplyDelete
  56. "BRAAAAAAAAP" is the sound of a smelly fart, not an air horn.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Air horns are more of a honk than a brap.

    ReplyDelete
  58. fucking magnets, how do they work?

    ReplyDelete
  59. Some people have pointed out that it's silly of me to have listed the BBC as a non-mainstream media source. To people living in Britain, yes, you are right. But Randall and I don't live in britain (we live in a house together near boston). Few Americans watch BBC and their coverage is significantly different in style and substance from mainstream american news. Randall definitely would NOT have included CNN, or any other american counterpart to the BBC, in that comic - because it is too mainstream, and BBC isn't, and randall doesn't want people to think he actually watches the real news.

    tl rd: In america, BBC is NOT mainstream media, not at all

    ReplyDelete
  60. I'll get to the current comic eventually. Let me just ask... what the heck is up with these cuddlefish calling this a forum? Shouldn't they know the difference between a blog and a forum(or, at least, what a forum is)?

    So little time, so much to do,

    Mole.

    ReplyDelete
  61. A forum is a public place where people hold discussion.

    ReplyDelete
  62. "Randall definitely would NOT have included CNN, or any other american counterpart to the BBC, in that comic - because it is too mainstream, and BBC isn't, and randall doesn't want people to think he actually watches the real news."

    Huh? We're talking about http://xkcd.com/477/ right? What's the VERY FIRST link namedropped?

    ReplyDelete
  63. Carl you never cease to be DUMB AND USELESS.

    ReplyDelete
  64. I have to ask if you've seen any stand-up comedy.

    Not that this comic was especially funny (or any recent XKCD comics for that matter), but stand-up is chock-full of exaggerations. Grotesques and satire and especially impersonations; heck, even televised comedy, shows like Spitting Image - a genre-defining television classic. Featuring hideous puppets, no less.

    I don't think you know much about comedy at all, to be honest.

    ReplyDelete
  65. Anon 1:44

    wat? I mean really, wat?

    ReplyDelete
  66. Anon 2:37

    He means you're an idiot.

    ReplyDelete
  67. Fred, Donald CunderThunts - all the time. We have 24 hour news, they have to fill it with something

    ReplyDelete
  68. Oh, and if its not ok to put words into the mouth of a FICTIONAL CHARACTER, then narrative fiction will have to be written. (incidentally, lucky guess!)

    ReplyDelete
  69. Oh, and if you don't believe how retarded the news is when it snows, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=68mkgir5fbw

    ReplyDelete
  70. "Oh, and if its not ok to put words into the mouth of a FICTIONAL CHARACTER"

    Especially a fictional character that is NOT supposed to be representing a class of people from real life-- ... oh, wait, he IS! Duh, silly me, folks.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Am I a bad person for liking 757? The alt-text is overly topical, but the essential conceit -- it'd be fun to airhorn the kind of person who couches their bragging in humble terms -- is pretty funny.

    For example, if someone said to me, "not like it's a big deal, but I do draw a very popular webcomic on the internets." I'd airhorn the fuck out of that guy.

    I'm sure, of course, that there's some integral element to the comedic construction that I've missed. But you have to consider that BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ BZZZZZZBZZZZZZBZZZZZZZZZ BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

    BZZZZZZZZZZ

    BZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ

    ReplyDelete
  72. Awesome, now the xkcd thread have turned into "mmmmmm, 'vuvuzela' sounds like 'vulva'... mmm."

    ReplyDelete
  73. Yes, the fictional character represents a class of people, and said something that may or may not have been said by real people of that class. But the comic doesn't say claim that it happened, and it's - a joke?

    I'm just objecting to 'it would be funnier if the newsguy was saying something that was actually said, even though that would be less funny, because it would be Funny Because It's True (TM).'

    ReplyDelete
  74. if it's a joke, it's a joke which relies on your assumption that this is the sort of thing that actually happens in order for it to be funny.

    which is why it's funny when the Daily Show does it--because they are actual clips of people saying actual stupid things--and why Randy isn't--because he's just making up something stupid for someone to say.

    ReplyDelete
  75. Yeah, not such a bad assumption if you've actually watched any news lately.

    ReplyDelete
  76. you miss the point. I guess I shouldn't be surprised, as you are defending XKCD, but nevertheless.

    the point is that, since the media is stupid, there are plenty of actual stupid things to choose from to make fun of them. it's pretty easy to do, especially given how incredibly dumb the media is.

    if you're going to make something up, it had better be actually legitimately funny--in some way interesting or different. Network was a fictional work that critiqued the media, and it was brilliant. Randy's work is fiction, but it's insipid. it doesn't offer clever commentary. it doesn't really expose anything interesting about the media. it's doing nothing more than saying "the media only reports on public ignorance and doesn't know it's doing it!" and it's doing this in the least clever way possible: by just straight up saying it.

    it's not exaggerating any of the media's traits for humor, nor is it exposing anything the media has actually done to expose it to ridicule. it is just making an assertion and passing it off as a joke.

    ReplyDelete
  77. But it *is* "exaggerating the medias traits for humour"! And you criticised it for doing exactly that!

    Now youre saying it *isnt* doing that, and youre criticising it for that too!

    Damned if you do, damned if you dont, eh?

    ReplyDelete
  78. I never said it exaggerated the media's traits. its biggest problem is the fact that it doesn't do anything with it. it just makes a claim, and then sort of stares at you expectantly.

    ReplyDelete
  79. Rob's corpulence is second only to his sexual persistence.

    *stares*

    ReplyDelete
  80. Fuck you, Rob.

    Fuck you right between the eyes.

    ReplyDelete
  81. Ugh, I hate the black hat guy comics. He's a character Randal borrowed from Men In Hats and then proceeded to fail at writing. Funnily enough, this is maybe the closest Randal has ever gotten to characterizing him right, although in Men In Hats he would probably just light the guy on fire or something.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Wait, the Daily Show is funny because he takes stuff people say? So that impression of Dubya he's so famous for, everything he says when he does that is a direct quote, right?

    ReplyDelete
  83. Wait, the Daily Show is funny?

    ReplyDelete
  84. Haven't you read Rob's new blog, dailyshowdoesntsuck.blogspot.com ?

    ReplyDelete
  85. and John comes back with an incredibly pathetic zinger! it sure is a good thing I didn't specifically say that comically exaggerating traits for humor--something this comic did not do--is another way to make things funny.

    but congratulations on finally grasping the basics of sarcasm! it's an important first step in understanding why XKCD is so incredibly terrible.

    ReplyDelete
  86. the daily show is famous for playing back to back clips of politicians and journalists either contradicting themselves or just being bone shatteringly stupid. his impressions are notoriously bad and no one watches the show for them.

    as to my comment above....i think it proves once and for all that i have no idea what i am talking about. I'm surprised more people didn't call me on my epic stupidity. it was incidental to my point, but still: ugh.

    ReplyDelete
  87. Why do the illiterate always refer to television as "the media" as if it were the only one? Maybe, to them, television IS the only medium.

    HINT: multiple channel selection doesn't make television more than one medium.

    ReplyDelete
  88. I love when prescriptivists are wrong.

    first: "the media" refers to, and here I am quoting from dictionary.com's first entry for "media," "the means of communication, as radio and television, newspapers, and magazines, that reach or influence people widely." it is, as such, a collective noun. regarding its usage as a collective noun, the American Heritage Dictionary has this to say:

    "People also use media with the definite article as a collective term to refer not to the forms of communication themselves so much as the communities and institutions behind them. In this sense, the media means something like "the press." Like other collective nouns, it may take a singular or plural verb depending on the intended meaning. If the point is to emphasize the multifaceted nature of the press, a plural verb may be more appropriate: The media have covered the trial in a variety of formats. Frequently, however, media stands as a singular noun for the aggregate of journalists and broadcasters: The media has not shown much interest in covering the trial. This development of a singular media parallels that of more established words such as data and agenda, which are also Latin plurals that have acquired a singular meaning. The singular medium cannot be used as a collective noun for the press. The sentence No medium has shown much interest in covering the issue, would suggest that the lack of interest is in the means of communication itself rather than in its practitioners. "

    the most prevalent form the media takes in Western society tends to be the television, but print, online, and radio journalism are also included in "the media" and tend to have the same problems--it's why they get lumped together in the same collective noun.

    thanks for playing "idiots and pedants!" I hope you return again soon!

    ReplyDelete
  89. I think that should be "We already know that Randall loathes the media." After all, we're not dead, he's not dead, and hasn't stopped loathing...

    ReplyDelete
  90. Isn't this a little bit too meta, even for you, Randall?

    ReplyDelete