Tuesday, July 1, 2014
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
"[a] vitriolic and bitter collection of unwarranted nastiness about a silly and harmless comic."
Welcome. This is a website called XKCD SUCKS which is about the webcomic xkcd and why we think it sucks. My name is Carl and I used to write about it all the time, then I stopped because I went insane, and now other people write about it all the time. I forget their names. The posts still seem to be coming regularly, but many of the structural elements - like all the stuff in this lefthand pane - are a bit outdated. What can I say? Insane, etc.
I started this site because it had been clear to me for a while that xkcd is no longer a great webcomic (though it once was). Alas, many of its fans are too caught up in the faux-nerd culture that xkcd is a part of, and can't bring themselves to admit that the comic, at this point, is terrible. While I still like a new comic on occasion, I feel that more and more of them need the Iron Finger of Mockery knowingly pointed at them. This used to be called "XKCD: Overrated", but then it fell from just being overrated to being just horrible. Thus, xkcd sucks.
Here is a comic about me that Ann made. It is my favorite thing in the world.
no u
ReplyDeleteno u
DeleteU Thant
DeleteThis is funnier than 93.5% of xkcds
ReplyDeleteThree significant figures. That's fucking brave. I hope you have data to prove this.
DeleteThis is so sexy.
ReplyDeleteFinding people to work with is the easiest thing in the world... If you have to pay them, creatives usually underprice themselves. I once had a guy write for me in a game contest on the promise of a $10 Chili's gift card if the game won the $100,000 prize.
ReplyDelete"......Finding people to work with is the easiest thing in the world... ...."
DeleteFinding cunts with whom to work who abide the rules of The Queen's English is the hardest thing in the world.
You are an unlettered and probably innumerate cunt R. And no mistake.
I'm scorning the cultural perversion—where a man who actually did the right thing, that is, restrained himself when under assault, gets fired for committing a lesser offense of racist grievance, and his original virtuous behavior goes unacknowledged. Instead of shooting her dead, he exhibited self-control, and was racist in response.
ReplyDeleteRob, your micro-fiction is getting worse.
Deletethat's not me
DeleteRob, your dissociative identity disorder is getting worse.
DeleteAs a National Socialist, I'm also really disgusted by Cumia's hatred for the poor. You can say it's just a bit, I only think part of it is. But even so, no one says the shit he does on TV or radio or really even outside of Stormfront. It's refreshing. I think there's a lot more racists in this country then you think. It's quite a growing set of ideas -- and to brush off off ideas of racism as undeserving is just a dick move.
ReplyDeleteMore than you think, you dickshit.
DeleteThe word "than" was meant to be bold. The word "dickshit" was meant to be brown.
DeleteEvery word in the comments is bold, turdburglar. The word "dickshit" is brown because I smeared it with fæces.
DeleteThink about that. Get a good picture in your head, That's what she, of a 32 year old man, 300 lb., stinking of BO, shoving his finger up his ass and picking out rancid poop, then rubbing it across the screen. Across your words. The little irregular brown specks. The earthy stench. The faint smell of bloody piss. Really get a good picture.
If someone had broken into your home, I would first ask you if you were hurt and how to help. That's the very first thing I would do. If you then say "I did everything I could to prevent it!" and I notice you left the door unlocked, I'll point that out.
Delete"........and I notice you left the door unlocked, I'll point that out......."
DeleteAnd after you bring to my attention this oversight, I would inform you that only illiterate cunts use phrasal verbs. And only fucking illiterate cunts split an already vile phrasal verb with a demonstrative pronoun.
Phrasal verb: point out
Demonstrative pronoun: that
AND Ending a sentence with a preposition is something up with which Sir Winston and I will not put.
Rob?
Who is this fucking arsewhole Cuntribbit?
he is less a person and more a vehicle for locating and repeating the vilest things on the internet
DeleteA vehicle or a conduit?
DeleteIf a vehicle, meh, I's not interested, but if a conduit, well, maybe we should talk.
conduit does seem more apt, though I'm not sure precisely how much more apt. I'm not sure if aptness even has a sliding scale on which things can be measured.
DeleteIt never fails!
DeleteEvery conversation we have Rob always converges on your obsession with Logical Relevance no matter the topic with which it starts. This time you sneak in a thinly disguised reference to the sliding scale of aptness as it pertains to deductive question-answering. Answers should not be considered either absolutely true or false in relation to a question but should be considered true more flexibly in a sliding scale of aptness.
For instance, I can reason rigorously about the appropriateness of an answer to a question, such as, "Is Rob a cunt"? Incomplete, inconsistent or error-prone answers to this query can be evaluated through a regimen of logical relevance to determine if any given answer is in fact an answer to that question.
one can argue that there is no true answer to that question.
DeleteOne may argue that the world is dodecahedral, it doesn't necessarily mean the argument thereto advanced to support that premise is valid - or indeed if the premise itself is valid.
Delete"Rob is an effably cunctating cunt"
Can this declarative be verified as a truism if true?
Alternatively, can this declarative be proven false if not true?
Statements are indeed meaningless if they cannot be either verified or falsified.
"There is a Heaven"
This is not a valid statement. Although, if true, it can be verified - at least by those who end up there - but the statement lacks falsifiability. If it is false it cannot be proven to be so.
Accordingly, Christopher Hitchens by now does not know he was right all along.. Pope John Paul II by now does not know that he was wrong all along.
Nyuck, the fuck nyuck!
Accordingly, your statement, "one can argue that there is no true answer to that question." is an invalid statement. It can neither be verified nor falsified. In short, it's a cuntingly fuct statement.
And if you don't like unicorns you're a fag!
are you casting doubt on the fundamentally hexagonal nature of reality? for shame.
DeleteI'm proud of Randy for finally being self-deprecating.
ReplyDeleteRob is Fat.
ReplyDeleteA nostalgic look back
ReplyDeleteR. December 21, 2009 at 3:25 PM
Is there a way to ban Aquarians?
Aquarians Love To Fuck December 21, 2009 at 4:27 PM
R. said:
"...Is there a way to ban Aquarians?..."
Now this looks like a job for me
So everybody, just follow me
Cause we need a little, controversy
Cause it feels so empty, without me
I said this looks like a job for me
So everybody, just follow me
Cause we need a little, controversy
Cause it feels so empty, without me
"[a] vitriolic and bitter collection of unwarranted nastiness about a silly and harmless comic."
Innit?
Aquarians Love To Fuck December 21, 2009 at 4:50 PM
If that establishment cunt Eminem isn't to your taste, how 'bout some The Clash?
Should I stay or should I go now?
Should I stay or should I go now?
If I go there will be trouble
An’ if I stay it will be double
So come on and let me know!
Innit?
*neckbeard
Delete*fedora
*misguided sense of chivalry (milady)
*dull grasp of yemen
*ponies
Did i miss anything?
Did you know that hot can also mean hot?
ReplyDeleteIn the future, one out of every six people will be YOU.
ReplyDelete