Luckily, I have been taught to back up claims with empirical evidence, so here you go:
That's a chart of the first 400 xkcd comics, and how frequent certain themes were. Computer jokes have risen dramatically. The x-axis measures comics going forward in time, and the y-axis measures density of joke types (a point at the very top of the graph indicated 80% of the jokes at that time were of that theme, a point at the bottom indicates 0%)And then of course he occasionally hits you with something like 383 which just comes out of nowhere and smacks you upside the head while yelling "expecting, that, bitch? Didn't think so!" I guess it's his artistic, meaningful side? As you once said, communicating badly and then acting smug when you're misunderstood is not cleverness. And being cryptic and weird and then acting smug (which you know you are when you posted that, it's not like you're sitting there regretting it) is not artistic, nor is it funny.
Anyway, because I do think there is a lot to like about XKCD (two examples: the aforementioned 169 and also 262) do not expect this to be a website where I just complain all the time. If something is good, I'll say so. If something only sucks a little, I won't give it any flack it doesn't deserve. And I will do my best to always link to xkcd.com. Oh and I refer to comics by number, not name. Just easier.
PS - if you are curious as to what I think doesn't suck, head on over to www.qwantz.com for Dinosaur Comics, which are great.
Your x-axis needs to be labeled more clearly. How often are you putting down a data point? I'd also be interested in seeing a straight number-of-this-type-of-comic-per-week graph as opposed to a density graph in order to get a better sense of the trend.
ReplyDeleteFinally, I'm tempted to argue against the nature of your dislike of the "cute nerdy relationship" comics, except that I kind of agree.
(Yes, I do need to write this as a comment while sitting three feet from you.)
OK fine. Here is how it works - each tick mark on the x axis (there are 40 in all) represents 10 comics. The first 10 comics are represented in the line 1 unit from the origin, numbers 11-20 are in the line 2 tick marks away, etc. How high the point is on the Y axis represents how many comics of that type appeared in the 10 day segment. So you can think of the y-axis as the actually number per time unit, as you request (though I went for 10 comics, about 3 weeks, rather than 1 week). But it can also be read in terms of density.
ReplyDeleteI know that this is a blast from the past and everything, but I was wondering: by 'computer science', do you mean actual computer science - algorithms, program structure, etc - or do you mean computers, the Internet, operating systems, and general nerdiness?
ReplyDeleteThe latter. Algorithms, programming, programming languages, etc. Stuff beyond the realm of the average nerd and into the territory of the computer nerd.
ReplyDeleteThat would be "the former."
ReplyDeleteum...yeah. i am stupid.
ReplyDeleteLooser
ReplyDeletebut it's already loose enough!
ReplyDeleteMaybe you shouldn't take pride in being stupid when you're trying to make a case against a "smart" webcomic. I'm assuming it was a simple mistake you made, but still...not helping your case much...
ReplyDeleteSo loose the thing's flappin
ReplyDeletefun fact! people often say "I am stupid" to acknowledge a mistake they made.
ReplyDeleteI'm pretty sure he wasn't smug about 383. It seems to me like he was trying to take responsibility for a friend's happiness, who then killed herself. It's not very fucking fun to be in that situation, I'm sure his feelings for that comic were pretty goddamn far from smug.
ReplyDelete